On which issue are Ashley and Andy most likely to disagree?

On which issue are Ashley and Andy most likely to disagree?

• A. The problems caused for society by economic exploitation of natural resources
• B. The ability of mainstream religious authorities to provide guidance to society
• C. The value of alternative medicine
• D. The dangers of global warming

Answer: (C)

The emphasis on the value of alternative medicine as the issue on which Ashley and Andy are most likely to disagree suggests that their perspectives on health, wellness, and the efficacy of different medical practices diverge significantly. This kind of disagreement often stems from foundational beliefs about science, tradition, and personal experiences with health care. In discussions about alternative medicine, individuals may have vastly different views based on their reliance on conventional medicine versus holistic or non-conventional approaches. One person may advocate for alternative medicine due to personal or anecdotal successes, whereas the other might prefer evidence-based practices and thus be skeptical of alternatives that lack rigorous scientific validation. This disagreement can be particularly pronounced because it touches on deeper values, such as trust in medical institutions, beliefs about health and well-being, and varying definitions of what constitutes effective treatment. Other issues listed, while significant, tend to have more consensus within societal discussions, as they are often informed by broader social, environmental, and economic understandings that transcend personal health beliefs.

The emphasis on the value of alternative medicine as the issue on which Ashley and Andy are most likely to disagree suggests that their perspectives on health, wellness, and the efficacy of different medical practices diverge significantly. This kind of disagreement often stems from foundational beliefs about science, tradition, and personal experiences with health care.

In discussions about alternative medicine, individuals may have vastly different views based on their reliance on conventional medicine versus holistic or non-conventional approaches. One person may advocate for alternative medicine due to personal or anecdotal successes, whereas the other might prefer evidence-based practices and thus be skeptical of alternatives that lack rigorous scientific validation.

This disagreement can be particularly pronounced because it touches on deeper values, such as trust in medical institutions, beliefs about health and well-being, and varying definitions of what constitutes effective treatment. Other issues listed, while significant, tend to have more consensus within societal discussions, as they are often informed by broader social, environmental, and economic understandings that transcend personal health beliefs.